WHICH SPECIES TO SAVE?
Summary:
This article mainly focuses on the numbers in which the animals are decreasing. The article gives different researchers opinions on the topic and gives insights on which animals should be focused on to save. For example, through the process of step to determine which animal to save the Gray wolf would win over the Chinese river Dolphin in 2008 the Wildlife Conservation society focused on the numbers of declining animal species. Researchers have spent months analyzing the numbers and putting forward the project of helping them. The process was very long and many researcher took their time to focus on the animals and which were the most important of the many they had listed. The process was so long that the work effort was brought down a bit through time, when they did not agree on something and discussed about it as stated in the article the researcher could just shrug down and say " Im overwhelmed." Many times having too many animals and species listed can harm the economy in some way. As stated in the article sooner or later a vulnerable species would be to hard to save. To determine which animals should be best to keep and saved the conservationists are pushing new ways to bring systematic thinking into which animals are important. Some scientist actually calculate this through the process of the role these animals play in the ecosystem. The advantage of this approach is that it focuses on the ecological roles rather than the raw numbers of species giving a better chance to advance. The process has been advancing and has been more efficient but the Us legal scholars have also suggested ways of reforming the Endangered Species Act to reckon with this reality.
This article mainly focuses on the numbers in which the animals are decreasing. The article gives different researchers opinions on the topic and gives insights on which animals should be focused on to save. For example, through the process of step to determine which animal to save the Gray wolf would win over the Chinese river Dolphin in 2008 the Wildlife Conservation society focused on the numbers of declining animal species. Researchers have spent months analyzing the numbers and putting forward the project of helping them. The process was very long and many researcher took their time to focus on the animals and which were the most important of the many they had listed. The process was so long that the work effort was brought down a bit through time, when they did not agree on something and discussed about it as stated in the article the researcher could just shrug down and say " Im overwhelmed." Many times having too many animals and species listed can harm the economy in some way. As stated in the article sooner or later a vulnerable species would be to hard to save. To determine which animals should be best to keep and saved the conservationists are pushing new ways to bring systematic thinking into which animals are important. Some scientist actually calculate this through the process of the role these animals play in the ecosystem. The advantage of this approach is that it focuses on the ecological roles rather than the raw numbers of species giving a better chance to advance. The process has been advancing and has been more efficient but the Us legal scholars have also suggested ways of reforming the Endangered Species Act to reckon with this reality.
My opinion
-In my opinion i can see that the process is both fair and unfair. I think that the process is unfair because every animals and specie had some impact in the ecosystem but some did not have the greatest impact all the time. It is also unfair because these animals had no choice and because of humans and the use of resources the population for these species decreased and now we are deciding if these species should stay and be helped or just waited off to be extinct. Every animal is important just like every human and person is important as well. Yes our population many increase but that does not mean that those newborns are not worth anything to us. In a way i see that this process is fair as well because many times we can do anything more for those animals that are already at the tip of going extinct. Yes we could of done something about it to prevent it but that was in the past and now min many cases we don't have a choice but to just leave them to go extinct. I can also see it as a fair case because many times these animals don't give us many uses to help humans because their is other that provide us with more ways of help such as the examples given in the article.
-In my opinion i can see that the process is both fair and unfair. I think that the process is unfair because every animals and specie had some impact in the ecosystem but some did not have the greatest impact all the time. It is also unfair because these animals had no choice and because of humans and the use of resources the population for these species decreased and now we are deciding if these species should stay and be helped or just waited off to be extinct. Every animal is important just like every human and person is important as well. Yes our population many increase but that does not mean that those newborns are not worth anything to us. In a way i see that this process is fair as well because many times we can do anything more for those animals that are already at the tip of going extinct. Yes we could of done something about it to prevent it but that was in the past and now min many cases we don't have a choice but to just leave them to go extinct. I can also see it as a fair case because many times these animals don't give us many uses to help humans because their is other that provide us with more ways of help such as the examples given in the article.
So what?
We need to focus on how many animals are going endangered and process new laws or if not we would run out of animals that provide many services for us. What if? If overpopulation keeps going up and we don't save and focus on the animals and they become extinct the humans are going to suffer and numerous ways. |
Says who? Researchers have said that this will impact us a lot and studies just show.
What does this remind me of? -when fishing at the old times was very famous and hen people started hunting and adapting to those things. |